Abstract Guidelines

• The presenting author must be listed as the first author​
• Abstracts must be written in English and should not exceed 200 words. Any exceeded pass the 200-word mark will not be considered. ​
• Abstract title be limited to 20 words ONLY. ​
• Please take note of the important dates HERE. Deadline for submission of abstracts is 30 May 2025. All authors will be notified about final acceptance on 2 June - 15 August 2025.​
• Abstracts must be allocated to a specific theme which you can view HERE
• Papers should be thoroughly checked and proofread before submission. Unless specifically requested by the Advisory Board, the organising committee will not accept revised submissions.  ​
• You may submit more than one abstract. However, accepted authors can present only once at the Knowledge Hub. If you have more than 1 abstracts accepted to be presenting at the conference, you may request your co-author to deliver the other presentation(s). ​
• Prior to submission, you are required to seek all relevant approvals, clearances, and ensure your availability to participate as a potential speaker. ​
• Authors are NOT required to submit their full technical papers (manuscripts).​
• Employees of IPPs or Utilities in Asia will be prioritised.​
• Vendors who wish to participate at Knowledge Hubs will have to be sponsoring or exhibiting at Enlit Asia to be considered.

The submitted technical papers need to demonstrate a deep understanding of challenges posed by the energy transition and propose novel solutions that have tangible impact. In evaluating the abstracts, we consider the following six criteria:​

• Thematic Relevance: Abstract fits well into the Enlit Asia themes and topics​

• Significance and Impact: Problem statement is clearly defined, and abstract is well supported by results and/or case studies. ​

• Originality and Level of Innovativeness: Abstract demonstrates novel ideas, and introduces significant new approaches, technical findings, and/or use cases.  ​

• Practicality and Contribution: Abstract indicates a future-ready solution and idea that is ready for implementation. ​

• Avoid Biasness and Commercialism: Abstracts must be of high quality and is presented without any inclination toward a particular company or provider. Overly commercial abstracts will receive lower scores.​

• Overall Quality of Content: Abstract is coherent, well-structured, and easy to understand.​

In summary, an abstract with an original and strong problem definition and offer practical, future-ready, and techno-economic solutions that are backed by solid data and research will receive higher gradings.